When physically prompting a resistant client, what should you do?

Using minimal touch and discussing strategies with the supervisor is crucial when working with a resistant client. This approach recognizes the importance of respecting the client’s autonomy and comfort level, which can help to foster a sense of safety and trust. It also emphasizes a collaborative approach to decision-making, suggesting that consultation with a supervisor can provide guidance and support in developing effective prompting strategies tailored to the specific needs of the client.

Implementing minimal touch allows you to assess the client’s responses and adjust the level of prompting required without overwhelming them. Engaging in discussion with a supervisor ensures that the techniques used are not only effective but also ethical and appropriate for the individual’s circumstances, promoting a supportive and adaptive learning environment.

In contrast, more invasive techniques such as holding the arm tighter or applying pressure on joints can lead to increased resistance and discomfort, undermining rapport and potentially magnifying the client’s anxiety or opposition. The most to least prompting technique might not always be suitable for every scenario, especially if it does not take the client’s individual needs and responses into account. Thus, the focus on minimal touch and seeking guidance aligns with best practices in working with clients on the autism spectrum.